Cynthia Love, who suffered a crushing hand injury while operating metal-bending machinery at Kaspar Ranch Hand Equipment's Shiner facility in March 2017, had won a substantial arbitration award after her employer's statute of limitations defense failed. Love lost three fingers after 'loose material' on her employer-provided glove got caught in the machine, requiring multiple surgeries and partial amputations. She sued Kaspar in October 2018 for negligence, gross negligence, and premises liability, seeking millions in damages.

Writing for the panel, Justice Fonseca ruled that arbitrator Elizabeth Ray exceeded her authority under the Federal Arbitration Act by issuing an award that completely ignored the parties' central dispute over whether Love's claims were time-barred. 'Ray's eight-page final arbitral award consisted of more than two thousand words, none of which addressed Kaspar's statute of limitations defense—which was undisputably properly pleaded in the arbitration proceedings and was the subject of multiple motions,' Fonseca wrote. The arbitration policy explicitly required the arbitrator to include 'at least a summary of all findings of fact and law necessary to support the arbitrator's decision.'

The court delivered sharp criticism of Ray's handling of the limitations issue, noting that 'the factual and legal bases for the arbitrator's rulings on those issues are 'necessary to support' her decision.' Justice Fonseca emphasized that Love's arbitration claim was filed on January 17, 2020, nearly ten months after the two-year limitations period expired, making the limitations defense central to the dispute. The court observed that even Ray's earlier orders during the proceedings failed to 'explicitly conclude whether Kaspar's limitations defense had merit' or 'provide any factual findings which could support any ruling on those dispositive issues.'

The case reached arbitration after a complex procedural history. The trial court initially granted Kaspar's motion to compel arbitration in April 2019, but the process was delayed when Kaspar elected to mediate in September 2019, though no mediation ever occurred. Love finally initiated arbitration in January 2020. The first arbitrator, Charles Seymore, initially denied Kaspar's summary judgment motion on limitations but then granted reconsideration before withdrawing from the case. Ray replaced Seymore and ultimately denied the limitations defense, leading to a five-day hearing in August 2022 that resulted in Love's award.

Kaspar argued that Ray had no legal or factual basis to reject the limitations defense and that her decision was based 'merely' on what 'she determine[d] to be fair or just' in violation of the arbitration policy. The company contended that Love never properly pleaded equitable tolling as a defense and that Ray failed to hold Love to her burden of proving tolling was appropriate. Love responded that her claims were eligible for tolling based on her timely state court filing and Kaspar's own delays in the arbitration process.

The ruling adds to a line of Texas cases recognizing that parties can contractually require arbitrators to provide detailed factual findings, even under the FAA. Justice Fonseca distinguished the case from federal precedent limiting judicial review, writing that 'there is no doubt that the FAA permits restrictions on the arbitrator's authority in a multitude of other manners.' The court noted that while arbitrators generally need not explain their reasoning, 'arbitration is a creature of contract and parties are free to modify any generally applicable common-law rules.'

The court rejected Love's argument that Ray's earlier procedural orders satisfied the findings requirement, explaining that those orders 'did not explicitly conclude whether Kaspar's limitations defense had merit' and failed to provide the factual analysis required by the agreement's terms. The decision effectively eliminates Love's substantial recovery and returns the parties to square one, with Love taking nothing from her former employer despite her severe workplace injuries.