The Supreme Court will decide whether Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 provides a private right of action for employees of educational institutions alleging sex discrimination.
The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed mifepristone to remain available by mail, blocking a Fifth Circuit ruling that would have banned the drug's postal distribution while the underlying legal challenge proceeds.
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that federal law does not shield freight brokers from state lawsuits claiming they negligently hired dangerous motor carriers, resolving a circuit split.
Virginia’s Republican legislators asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday to uphold the state Supreme Court’s decision invalidating a constitutional amendment that would have allowed the General Assembly to draw a new congressional map for the 2026 elections.
The Supreme Court unanimously held that a federal court retains jurisdiction to confirm or vacate an arbitral award if it previously stayed the underlying claims under the Federal Arbitration Act, even if the confirmation motion lacks an independent jurisdi...
The Trump administration has begun issuing refunds to importers following a Supreme Court ruling that invalidated a previous tariff policy, while a separate appeals court has paused a lower court decision declaring the current 10% global tariffs illegal.
Daniel Harawa argues the federal government’s request to ban race from Fourth Amendment seizure analysis contradicts its own prior positions and Supreme Court precedent.
The Supreme Court may issue a decision Thursday in Foothills Christian Ministries v. Johnson on whether a California law requiring licensed childcare centers to post signs and distribute handouts informing parents that children are free to attend r...
The Supreme Court cleared the way for Alabama to use its 2023 congressional map, vacating a lower court order that had blocked the map as racially discriminatory and sending the case back for reconsideration in light of Louisiana v. Callais.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais has significantly raised the burden for plaintiffs challenging redistricting maps under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, requiring illustrative maps to meet not only traditional districting cr...
Virginia is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to override a state court decision that struck down a congressional map, arguing the ruling violated federal law and threatened the 2026 elections.
Nationwide mail access to mifepristone remains available after the Supreme Court extended a temporary stay blocking a Fifth Circuit order that would have required in-person dispensing, pausing the ruling until May 14.
The Supreme Court vacated a lower-court injunction blocking Alabama’s 2023 congressional map, sending the case back for review in light of its recent ruling in Louisiana v. Callais. Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, warning the order would cause c...
Days after the justices vacated Louisiana's congressional map, Alabama is pressing the court to let it sidestep a two-majority-Black-district order before its primary.
Four Supreme Court justices have raised serious constitutional questions about nitrogen hypoxia executions, with a scheduled June 11 Alabama execution set to give the court its next opportunity to intervene.
The Supreme Court struck down Louisiana’s congressional map, forcing a redraw before the 2026 elections and sparking heated dissent over the judiciary’s role in redistricting.
The Supreme Court ruled that plaintiffs must prove intentional racial discrimination to establish liability under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, rejecting claims based solely on disparate impact.
The Supreme Court refused to pause a lower court’s contempt order against Apple, allowing the penalty to remain in effect while the company appeals in its antitrust dispute with Epic Games.
WASHINGTON (LN) — The Supreme Court will decide if the First Amendment’s church autonomy doctrine protects religious institutions of litigation, not just liability, in a case involving the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
The ruling updates the legal framework that has governed minority voting rights claims for four decades, holding that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act imposes liability only when circumstances give rise to a strong inference of intentional racial discrimi...