Illinois Appeals Court Rules Installment Leave Payouts Can't Boost State Pensions
The First District upheld cuts to the pensions of retired state education board employees whose unused leave was paid out through payroll before they retired.
The First District upheld cuts to the pensions of retired state education board employees whose unused leave was paid out through payroll before they retired.
A state appeals court held that a law shielding East Bay utility pensions from assignment does not block a partner's claim under a cohabitation agreement.
The Sixth District gave Proposition 218's emergency exception its ordinary meaning and deferred to the county board's findings on federal funding cuts.
A Hermosa Beach officer fired for failing the city's COVID-19 vaccination requirement had no right to a POBRA administrative appeal, a state appeals court held.
A divided panel held that a 2005 highway-bill rider letting Oklahoma run environmental programs in Indian country did not expire in 2009 and bars EPA-imposed conditions.
A Sixth Circuit panel paused a ruling that voided TVA's approval of its Kingston gas plant, finding the agency likely to win on alternatives, precommitment and remedy.
The court held that federal foreign-investment review does not preempt a Texas law that blocked a Chinese-owned developer from connecting a solar project to the grid.
The court declined to rehear a disability case; Judge Bress and nine colleagues said its 'serious questions' test conflicts with Winter and Starbucks.
A two-judge quorum vacated a verdict for a Louisiana parish in a free-speech suit, citing repeated defense misconduct and the judge's use of a juror's press remarks.
A divided panel held the Tucker Act did not require dismissal of Fairfax County and Arlington challenges to the Education Department's enforcement of Title IX.
A diner who paid for premium local snapper at a restaurant that admitted selling over 29 tons of imported frozen fish as local premium species has plausibly alleged an injury in fact, the court held.
Affirming Chancery, the court held a former employee's claims to 2,375 bonus shares accrued by 2014, when Lam paid dividends to other holders, and expired by 2017.
Physicians and physician assistants practice in substantially similar fields under Iowa's expert-qualification law, the court held, reviving a missed-diverticulitis suit.
A 5-4 court found enough evidence that the airline fired a Mobile worker for seeking workers' compensation, but sent the $675,000 award back for the trial judge to explain.
The court held that good cause to end a car dealer's franchise is judged when the state board decides, so a dealer's gains during a four-year wait counted.
The court rejected an RNC challenge to a 2005 voter law but held, following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, that a county candidate had standing to sue.
A divided court told a Monroe County judge to vacate an order requiring seven depositions and to rule first on a bid to send a contract fight to New York.
Companies and individuals named as "protected parties" in a release a mother signed at a Beaumont trampoline park may enforce its arbitration clause, the court held.
The Sixth District held that Citizens' timely payment of an appraisal award was not a confession of judgment because the homeowners' lawsuit did not bring about the recovery.
The Fifth District reversed a writ ordering CalGEM to exempt up to 12 Kern County wastewater injection wells from CEQA and declared a grandfathering rule invalid.
A unanimous panel affirmed a $41,196.70 fee award against Panasia Estate, holding that fees under RPAPL 881 do not depend on which side prevails.
A unanimous First Department panel held that the defendants had to turn over a $413,731.53 recovery without deducting legal fees and list a Dutchess County property.
The First Department held Mount Sinai liable under the city's Human Rights Law for never discussing accommodations with a disabled manager.
The Third Department held that a landowner who dropped his property claims against the town with prejudice lost both those claims and his defenses to a land trust's suit.
The First Department upheld the fixture supplier's contract and lien claims but ordered new damages proceedings, disregarding proof Waterworks first offered in reply.
The First Department unanimously held that RBL Bank Limited could sue in New York and that the borrower and its guarantor could not invoke a Banking Law defense.
A unanimous First Department panel held that a formal agreement engaging the firm for a company that owned an estate's commercial property did not defeat the executors' claim to be the firm's clients.
The First Department held that Heritage's agreement, including its 60-day no-cause termination clause, pointed to a license, not a lease, and that neither occupant had conclusively shown it was entitled to tenants' notice rights.
A unanimous First Department panel held that funds holding bonds through Euroclear could sue and that a change in Chinese law did not excuse the issuer's nonpayment.
A divided panel held that Helling v. McKinney barred officials from ignoring pervasive mold at Huron Valley but granted immunity to five senior administrators.
The Fifth Circuit held that a trial court must decide whether a $13 million payment from bankrupt Cox Operating to GOL covered any part of the $2.7 million owed to Seacor.
A federal appeals court vacated an injunction against Georgia's SB 351, holding that NetChoice failed to meet its burden in a facial First Amendment challenge.
A Fifth Circuit panel vacated the FCC's fourth-quarter 2025 universal service contribution factor, holding the agency created USAC without the authorization a 1945 law requires.
A woman who needed surgery after a bone from Trader Joe's breaded cod fillets lodged in her esophagus may pursue her failure-to-warn claim, the court held.
A unanimous court held that judges weighing Nevada Public Records Act requests may not consider who is asking, even when the requester is an alleged victim.
The unanimous court said a truck driver who slipped at a self-service fueling station could show notice with evidence that the spill was a reasonably foreseeable risk.
The court held that Ohio's refiling statute saves a whole lawsuit rather than single claims and has no one-use limit, reviving negligence claims against Glenmede Trust.
The Second District held that an Elgin nut factory's owner had to warn contract workers that an obviously dangerous skylight lacked fall protection underneath.
The Fourth District held that Monmouth may sue under the Public Employee Disability Act to recover $55,370.66 paid to an employee who allegedly took a second job.
The Second District reversed a McHenry County judge's refusal to send an assisted-living death suit to arbitration but left unconscionability for the trial court.
A divided court rejected a referee's not-guilty recommendation and found Clayton Bowers Studstill violated Bar rules on candor and on obeying a court's instructions.
A state appeals court held that a contractor's false insurance applications let Scottsdale void its policies, leaving California's Military Department without coverage.
The Second Department barred RICO and fraud claims and cut two tort counts from the suit of a co-owner of the company that owned the Hudson Valley Resort, but kept her partner's counterclaim open.
The Second Department held that a promissory note lacking express language on fees on fees could not support Jonathan Davidoff's suit, and ordered the suit dismissed.
A New York appeals court affirmed cancellation of a would-be dealership buyer's notice of pendency after a judge found money damages would make the buyer whole.
Hempstead missed its deadline on a law firm's records appeal and must pay the firm's fees, the court held, but it upheld dismissal of the firm's second, premature suit.
The Second Department held that a contract from which the parties struck 'any other economic loss' excludes lost rent, but reopened the owner's security and equipment claims.
A New York appellate panel dismissed a fired employee's implied-covenant counterclaim under his contract's California-law clause but let his contract counterclaim proceed.
The justices stayed a Fourth Circuit mandamus order, reasoning that a court may not force the FCC to end its deliberations on a two-day deadline.
The court rejected environmental groups' challenge to Pennsylvania water permits for a Transco pipeline and held that a federal standard governs review of such state decisions.
A Ninth Circuit panel held California cannot require non-uniformed federal officers to display a name or badge number, calling the U.S. "certain to succeed."
For the second time, a federal appeals court reversed an injunction against a 2021 Kansas law barring groups from prefilling the mail-ballot applications they send voters.
A Milwaukee County deputy who killed a driver while looking at his phone or dashboard computer was negligent but did not violate due process, the court held.
A 2-1 panel held that a worker's estate did not plausibly plead that FirstEnergy retained control over the contractor whose employee fell from a collapsing catwalk.
The court held that Reven's executives could not fault a judge for ruling without a hearing they had jointly asked to cancel, and it left the modified freeze in place.
A federal appeals panel held that Florida's HB3, which bars children under 14 from opening social-media accounts, likely survives a First Amendment challenge.
The First District upheld a $520,000 negligence judgment against spine surgeon Abubakar Atiq Durrani but held the trial court had no basis to award attorney fees.
The court held a lawyer lacked probable cause to press a client's claimed interest in a family company after the state Supreme Court declined to review its rejection.
The Court of Appeals said the trial court never explained why it rejected a West Virginia firm's jurisdiction challenge and a bid to send the dispute to FINRA arbitration.
The court reversed a judge who struck down the 2021 law's hearing process and reinstated an order upholding a Grand River Dam Authority technician's firing.
Massachusetts' top court held that trade secret plaintiffs must prove irreparable harm and upheld a refusal to bar ex-Daikin workers from soliciting 75 customers.
The Third District held that Florida's good-faith defense for recipients of a debtor's money applies only to actual-fraud claims, not constructive-fraud claims.
The Fourth District upheld a $71,582.98 retainage award against GSD Contracting but struck $45,300 a Broward judge added for work the subcontractor never performed.
The Fourth District held that a partnership agreement's exclusive Nevada venue clause covers claims a trial judge had found existed independently of the agreement.
The Third District held res judicata could not bar buyers' bid to recover deposits above 15% after the developer resold their five units for more than the contract price.
The Third District held that Outfront lacked standing to attack a rival's kiosk deal because it claimed no special injury and no breach of its own contract rights.
Probate courts' equitable power to shift fees onto a bad-faith beneficiary protects the trust estate, not a trustee who pays to defend herself, the Fourth District held.
The Second District affirmed a judgment for the UC Regents, holding the law governs an employer's process, not its judgment that a conviction relates to the job.
The First Department upheld a finding that a church landlord gave up its lease's jury waiver by raising it four months after the tenants filed their note of issue.
The en banc court affirmed a judgment for Edward Williams, finding no historical tradition that supports disarming him over early-2000s DUI offenses.
A Tenth Circuit panel held that an officer who fired three fatal shots at a man holding a bat at his side during a civil standby call must face an excessive-force claim.
The court affirmed $10,000 in damages and $326,637.22 in fees and costs, and held Judge Eric Eighmy waited too long to press judicial immunity.
A divided panel held that Lidl workers ordered to report 15 minutes early and left outside locked stores were "engaged to wait" and may seek pay for that time.
A Fifth Circuit panel refused to let defendants facing a judgment of more than $210 million halt collection during their appeal by posting a $25 million bond.
The full Eleventh Circuit overruled its 1985 Mason decision, holding that ERISA does not require workers to exhaust plan remedies before suing over fiduciary breaches.
A client whose landlord suit was dismissed after the lawyers ignored discovery and a show-cause hearing need not have moved to vacate before suing them, the court held.
A unanimous court held that Idaho's open-range law protects a cow's owner even on a fenced interstate and that the state owed the injured driver no duty.
Class representatives may record wage liens for absent workers, Division One held, but liens on two apartment properties failed because they named none of the guards who worked there.
Two justices said convicting a man a second time of being "found in" the country, while he was barred from leaving it on supervised release, was difficult to square with the Constitution.
The court held that 25 patient declarations did not reduce the loss figure because the chiropractor's fraud on Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana was pervasive.
The court held the appeal moot under the Bankruptcy Code because Johnson & Johnson bought the rights in good faith and the insurers never obtained a stay of the sale.
An insurer owed $8.6 million by a company that lost its only client, Amazon, cannot collect from the family that owned the business, a federal appeals panel ruled.
A divided Arkansas Supreme Court held that Costco's Kirkland Signature label is one brand, so every supplier must use the wholesaler chosen first.
The trial court violated due process by shifting 30% of the fault to nonparty male students whom the State never blamed, the justices held, restoring $4.25 million.
The court held that a Mississippi seller that made more than 1,000 deliveries into Michigan could be sued there, and that its website terms did not shield it.
A unanimous court told the Ninth Circuit that a 2022 ban on officers waiving just-cause protection does not void a Gilbert police commander's 2021 at-will agreement.
The court held that only the Republican Party's executive committee could hear a pre-election challenge to Tuberville's residency, and that committee has already ruled for him.
A pharmacy-services exclusion barred every claim from a 1,000-fold belladonna overdose, and the owner's failure to read the policy defeated a suit against the agent.
The Fifth District affirmed an order voiding a $55,000 car-crash verdict after two jurors swore the panel discussed the defendant's wealth and insurance.
The Second District held that Medi-Cal may recover from a dead member's estate only what was paid for care the member received, and voided the state's regulation.
A state appeals panel ordered a San Bernardino County court to quash service on Fanuc Corp., holding California courts lack jurisdiction over the Japanese robot maker.
A unanimous panel held that her grievance gave Erie 1 BOCES timely knowledge of the claim, though she had no reasonable excuse for missing the 90-day deadline.
The Fourth Department unanimously declared that a teacher who quit his union in March could be charged dues until the August revocation window opened.
A unanimous panel affirmed an Erie County judge who cut a securitized lender's legal fees and refused to stack note-rate interest on top of default interest.
A federal appeals court held that Florida's $1,600-to-$3,000 fee for lawyers already admitted elsewhere burdens Floridians and out-of-staters alike.
A unanimous panel held that Sen. James C. Justice II's guaranty covers every premium his family's coal companies missed, not just $3.5 million owed when he signed.
Texas Capital Bank's lien securing over $28 million in bankruptcy loans to Reverse Mortgage Funding fell when Ginnie Mae extinguished the borrower's rights, the court held.
The court held that four scientific articles not shown to have reached the FDA could plausibly have let Amgen add a brain-injury warning to Aimovig after approval.
The court held that disclosing health data a plan administrator promised to keep confidential is a concrete injury, akin to breach-of-confidence suits of the founding era.
The court held that the Monterey Bay Aquarium's advice to avoid Gulf of Maine lobster targeted a fishery of thousands and did not single out the five plaintiffs.
Concurring in a mandamus denial, Justice Kyle D. Hawkins wrote that Rule 592 addresses property and that the court should intervene in an appropriate case if trial courts use it to jail deponents again.
The Fifth District held that two insureds failed to prove they needed a 2.0 contingency multiplier to hire a lawyer, cutting their fee award to the $125,080 lodestar.
The First District held that the Election Code's ban on dual circulation of nominating petitions does not reach nonpartisan Chicago Board of Education races.
The label's press release naming two women who sued under pseudonyms was protected, the court held, because they never asked a judge for permission to stay anonymous.
A unanimous panel held that a business owing a funder 15% of its future receivables failed to show the deal was a loan, a necessary element of a usury defense.
The First Department held that Iberdrola could not sue for fraud over work it was already obligated to perform under its construction contract.
A 3-2 appeals panel held that Bill Cosby's alleged use of the Cosby Show set to win a woman's trust did not make Carsey-Werner liable for his alleged assaults.
A unanimous First Department panel held that ads for lower-emission gasoline could not mislead consumers the city says already know fossil fuels drive climate change.
A federal appeals panel held that a Black woman fired from Remington Ammunition's Arkansas plant lacked evidence to take her discrimination and retaliation claims to a jury.
A Missouri inmate lost his bid to sue without prepaying the filing fee after the court held that a prior suit dismissed under Heck v. Humphrey counted as a strike.
The court held that an officer's single taser shot at a 70-year-old man who ignored commands and threw objects at him violated no clearly established law.
A Fifth Circuit panel held a trial judge properly found Winter Storm Uri excused Pioneer's shortfalls in gas deliveries to MIECO in February 2021.
A 2-1 panel held that a daughter plausibly alleged Knox County failed to train jail staff on overdoses after at least ten employees ignored her dying father's symptoms.
The Fourth District held that a purchase contract's fee clause did not let the couple who took over a buyer's contract collect legal fees from the buyer.
The Third DCA held that Resolvion, which never signed Juan Gonzalez's Honda lease, cannot use its arbitration clause against his tort claims over his car's seizure.
The Third District held that two unit owners' suit over the association's payments was derivative, so the presuit demand rules for such suits applied.
The First District held that sovereign immunity bars an estate's negligence claims over a disabled man's placement and care, and ordered judgment for all three defendants.
The First District held that a city charter amendment cannot undo a special law, even when the Legislature wrote that law into the city's charter.
The Fourth DCA held that a party may win appellate fees as a sanction for an opponent's fabricated case law, making the plaintiffs and their lawyer jointly liable.
On remand from the Florida Supreme Court, the panel again reversed leave to seek punitive damages against Federal Insurance Co. and William Douberley but affirmed as to Harold Peerenboom.
A First District panel held a Leon County grand jury overstepped by calling a $10 million Centene payment to Hope Florida "misappropriated" while charging no one.
A state appellate panel said residents adequately alleged Stanton bought and razed fourplexes over 17 years without the replacement housing state law requires.
An appeals panel affirmed summary judgment for Burbank Unified, holding indefinite unpaid leave was a reasonable FEHA accommodation of a teacher's religious vaccine exemption.
The Second Department held that Merlex Auto Group gave up its right to arbitrate a buyer's injury claim by litigating for about 18 months before seeking arbitration.
The Second Department said owners of vacant residential lots may use article 78 to fix city tax class errors, declining to follow a First Department ruling.
The Second Department said a shareholder's complaint did not show PepsiCo gave the affirmative help needed to plead it aided an alleged inflated-invoice scheme.
The Second Department dismissed a broker's remaining claims against the Long Island Board of Realtors and three officials over a $5,000 fine and account suspension.
The Second Department held that a claim Equinox's membership contract violated the Health Club Services Act does not void the agreement's arbitration clause.
The Second Department held a Google review mocking an attorney was protected opinion under New York's anti-SLAPP law and ordered him to pay the reviewer's legal fees.
The Second Department held the voluntary payment doctrine does not bar claims that a ticket seller disclosed fees too late or not conspicuously enough under state law.
A unanimous panel held that a demotion carrying a nearly $12,000 pay cut did not force a 60-year-old Rochester, Minn., fire department manager into retirement.
Deciding the question for the first time, the court sided with Sandoz on a briefing rule while vacating its $61.6 million contract award against United Therapeutics.
The court found UTC's patent settlement with Sandoz ambiguous on cartridge supply and sent the contract claim to trial, while upholding the dismissal of antitrust claims.
On remand from the Supreme Court, the 11th Circuit held an Atlanta family cannot sue the government over an FBI raid on the wrong home but may sue the agent who led it.
The Third District held that a psychologist's petition to end her five-year probation early gets deferential substantial-evidence review, not independent judgment.
The Sixth District held that a lot line adjustment bundled with the town's acceptance of a street easement was discretionary and not exempt from CEQA.
The First Department refused to narrow Letitia James' subpoena in a deceptive-review probe, citing the company's New York ties and ".nyc" email addresses.
The First Department held that Article 77 determinations that U.S. Bank reasonably accepted trust settlements in 2014 do not bar claims that U.S. Bank failed earlier to pursue Citigroup and JPMorgan over bad loans.
A unanimous panel rejected registrants' Eighth Amendment, ex post facto, vagueness, free-speech and due process claims against Missouri's sex offender registry.
Panel holds Arizona law already lets transgender people change the sex on their birth certificates by court order without surgery, so the statute stands.
Consumers have standing to attack DOE's 2024 dishwasher and clothes-washer water limits, the Fifth Circuit held, but the case cannot be heard first in district court.
Joining the Fourth and Eleventh Circuits, the Fifth Circuit held that appealing a federal-officer remand automatically stays the remand order while the appeal proceeds.
The Second District held that an employer faces strict liability only when the harasser supervises the plaintiff, not when the harasser supervises other employees.
A divided Second District panel reversed trial court orders that had invalidated an arbitration agreement, holding that strategic delay in asserting a sexual harassment claim forfeited the federal statute's protections.
The appeals court held that a defense verdict is not a judicial finding that the plaintiff breached the contract.
The appeals court held that a state enforcement statute lacks Rule 23's defining features, so CAFA jurisdiction never attached.
Panel rules Michigan tolling law ran continuously through class action's dismissal and reopening, sends notice question back to district court.
A unanimous panel shields Pasadena's COVID-19 testing policy and clarifies that the federal immunity statute bars claims based on the harm suffered, regardless of how plaintiffs label their causes of action.
A divided panel held that a federal statute stripping judicial review of discretionary immigration decisions does not bar challenges to mandatory threshold findings.
A split panel reversed summary judgment for Align Technology, finding triable disputes over whether its patent-litigation rationale was pretextual.
The court held that Pioneer's post-priority experiments showing only 2 of 8 tested enzymes worked properly supported a finding of non-enablement.
The appeals court held that Truinject failed to preserve its damages arguments below, ending an eight-year trade-secret and contract dispute.
The court held the cooperative had standing to appeal a ruling denying a complaint against it because FERC rejected its contract theory along the way.
A nurse failed to plausibly allege her employer's counterclaims seeking repayment of a sign-on bonus were objectively baseless, the appeals court held.
A divided panel holds that the accessibility regulation requires compliant doors but not wheelchair-accessible routes, declining to defer to DOJ commentary.
In a concurrence, Judge Ho responds to emails referencing a U.S. Senator sent to a magistrate under consideration for a district court seat.
The appeals court reversed an indefiniteness ruling, clarifying that scientific impossibility goes to enablement, not claim scope.
The appeals court found the district court misread the statute but affirmed dismissal because plaintiffs failed to plead that a parking tech company collected debts for anyone other than itself.
Panel declines to extend Hartman and Nieves probable-cause rules to minor civil enforcement actions like parking tickets.
A divided panel ruled that no clearly established law in 2021 gave a healthcare worker a Free Exercise right to a religious exemption from a COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
The appeals court held that Texas's presuit notification requirement is an element of warranty claims, not a procedural formality that can be cured after filing.
Per curiam opinion holds that LLC citizenship traces to every member, not the place-of-formation rules that govern corporations.
A federal court that dismisses a case for lack of Article III jurisdiction cannot adjudicate a contract-based fee request and must dismiss it outright.
The appeals court ruled that plan administrators who fail to tell claimants how long they have to sue cannot later invoke that deadline against them.
A 2-1 panel ruled that a district court judgment on a withdrawn adversary proceeding can be immediately appealed even while core bankruptcy matters continue.
The denial clears the way for a copper mine to destroy a Western Apache sacred site, though separate writings call for Supreme Court review.
The court refused to vacate an award that placed graduate students in a bargaining unit without prior NLRB classification, calling arbitration awards 'nearly impervious to judicial oversight.'
Split panel holds Cook County's CDC-grounded affidavits overcame pharmacist's religious challenge where she offered no evidence masking was a reasonable alternative.
A certified class saves challenges to Randolph County's prior bail practices from mootness despite mid-litigation policy swap.
Panel holds that requested video and witnesses could not alter outcome because alleged facts did not amount to constitutional violation.
The appeals court ruled that a restitution payment schedule is both a floor and a ceiling unless the sentencing judge specifies full payment is due at once.
The panel joins three sister circuits in rejecting an all-or-nothing approach to supplemental jurisdiction while reviving a malicious-prosecution claim against Walmart.
Panel finds clear and convincing evidence that fund filed baseless claim, then tried to escape discovery while preserving claims for another forum.
Appeals court adopts functional test for 'limited partner' status, holding that founders who run the business cannot escape the 15.3% tax.
A federal appeals court holds for the first time that cell-site simulators require a warrant, then shields the detectives who used one without one.
The appeals court held that pharmacy benefit managers' integrated federal and commercial negotiations support removal under the federal officer statute.
In a 11-2 vote, the full appeals court declined to revisit its holding that noncitizens present in the U.S. for years cannot be detained without bond hearings.
Panel finds no Fourth Amendment violation where officers kept firearms trained on suspected fugitive during felony arrest.
The appeals court held the domestic train maker had standing to challenge a federal waiver for the $3 billion Brightline West project but found the agency's decision was lawful.
A 6-3 stay order holds that IIRIRA's 'notwithstanding' clauses likely override the Privacy Act and Social Security Act to allow SSA data sharing with DHS.
The appeals court affirmed Ohio's denial of a preliminary injunction and vacated Tennessee's grant, holding that prediction market contracts are not protected from state gaming laws.
Anthropic's refusal to allow 'all lawful uses' of its Claude AI for the military qualifies as a supply chain risk, the court held.
The court held that Patrick Nichols plausibly alleged excessive force at the pleading stage and that a pro se civil-rights complaint can identify an intended defendant in its body even when the officer is omitted from the caption.
The court held the order is a restriction on access to government information, not a prohibition on speech, and thus does not violate the First Amendment.
The panel held that Massachusetts fraudulent-concealment tolling did not save Boston’s public-nuisance claim against OptumRx and Express Scripts because public litigation, reports and other materials gave the city the means to investigate alleged PBM wrongdoing before the limitations period expired.
The Fifth Circuit upheld the application of a Texas choice-of-law clause and most of a defense-and-indemnity ruling in Anadarko’s favor. It vacated the judgment to the extent it could require coverage for punitive or exemplary damages and remanded the treatment of fees from the underlying suit.
The court held that the legal basis for a physician’s claim under Ruan v. United States was reasonably available when he pleaded guilty, defeating cause for procedural default in his Section 2255 case.
Staffing-agency claims also fail due to unexhausted EEOC process, providing a roadmap for hospitals and vendors to defeat discrimination suits by contracted clinicians.
The court held that the New York Convention reaches a seaman’s employment agreement despite the FAA’s seaman exclusion, while limiting when nonsignatories can use equitable estoppel to compel a Jones Act claim.
The panel held that the Village of St. Bernard's remaining billboard rules survive intermediate scrutiny and are severable from the invalidated public-service sign carve-out, offering guidance on Ohio severance law.
The Fourth Circuit held that 125 working days can establish a year of coal-mine employment and that the absence of a required coverage statement supports a presumption of financial capability. The court remanded for further action directing payment from the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund.
The court vacated an order that blocked Illinois Union from filing a stay motion in the Bouvet case, holding that MDL case-management rules cannot make an insurer’s FAA remedy contingent on lead counsel’s consent.
The panel held that the FAA's mandatory language does not permit a district court to avoid ruling on a motion to compel arbitration by administratively closing the case.
Published ruling says an MDL court’s case-management procedures cannot condition an insurer’s statutory right to pursue a stay pending arbitration on lead counsel’s consent.
Panel says the district court should have declined supplemental jurisdiction over an unresolved Michigan constitutional issue after dismissing the federal claims.
The panel affirmed in part, denied cross-appeals, and remanded after finding no due-process violation in the detective's charges and reducing a $250,000 punitive award against the officer to $12,000 based on the 4:1 ratio marker.
Court rejects as-applied challenge by activists who recorded on private property after being told to leave.
Holding that the insurer's annual aggregate cap did not plainly apply to property damage, the panel reversed dismissal of the county's declaratory judgment claim and remanded for consideration of extrinsic evidence.
The court held that Roy Moore failed to offer clear and convincing evidence that Senate Majority PAC intended, or recklessly disregarded, the allegedly defamatory implication created by two frames in a campaign advertisement.
The Fifth Circuit held that advocacy organizations could not establish Article III injury by voluntarily redirecting legal-services resources in response to Texas’s immigration law, leaving the preemption question unresolved.
The panel held disputed issues about whether a man with schizoaffective disorder posed a threat must go to the jury, and the officer could not relitigate facts on interlocutory appeal.
The panel revived Ashley Cooper’s federal malicious-prosecution claim by holding that West Virginia’s two-year personal-injury period governs Section 1983 actions, but affirmed dismissal of the City of Wheeling because the complaint did not allege a municipal policy or custom.
The court affirmed judgment for RTI Restoration Technologies and Industrial Maintenance Industries, holding that a pension fund’s duty to issue a withdrawal-liability notice and demand “as soon as practicable” is an element of its claim that a court may decide without prior arbitration.
The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction sought by the Associated Press and other media plaintiffs challenging Indiana’s execution-witness policy.
The en banc court ruled that a content-based prior restraint on defendants' speech survives the heavy presumption against its validity because it is narrowly tailored to the compelling national-security interest in protecting perceived foreign collaborators.
Panel holds that ordinance requiring platforms to disclose deactivation policies regulates nonexpressive conduct or, alternatively, commercial speech subject to lower scrutiny.
The panel held that a district court abused its discretion by entering summary judgment for prison officials while a magistrate judge still had under advisement a sanctions motion over missing exculpatory video footage central to the inmate's claims.
The panel ruled that notes issued under indentures are not equity interests, but regular-interest certificates representing beneficial interests trigger the look-through exception, subjecting underlying mortgages to fiduciary duties.
In a 2-1 decision, the panel ruled that Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act applies to the EPA's development of nationwide water-quality criteria under CWA Section 304(a), rejecting the agency's argument that such guidance is not 'agency action' and expanding standing for environmental plaintiffs.
The full court affirmed municipal limits of $500 per individual for city council candidates, holding that the city met the low evidentiary bar for its anti-corruption interest and that the limits were closely drawn under Randall v. Sorrell.
Panel reverses $510,960 compensatory education award, adopting Third Circuit's interpretation of § 1415(f)(3)(C) and rejecting per se rule that a new diagnosis tolls the two-year deadline.
The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated a judgment in Safdieh v. Comm'r and remanded, holding that the Commissioner may assess penalties under Internal Revenue Code Section 6038(b).
In affirming dismissal of a retaliation suit against DHS, the Seventh Circuit held that Department of the Navy v. Egan's limit on reviewing security-clearance decisions goes to the merits, not the court's power to hear the case—reshaping how defense counsel must plead the defense.
In United States v. Bolandian, the court held a trial judge's duty to investigate a juror's expressed doubts about impartiality cannot be waived by defense counsel's silence or agreement, ordering a new trial.
A Ninth Circuit panel enjoined enforcement of the 'No Vigilantes Act' identification requirement against federal agencies, holding the United States is likely to prevail on its claim that the law directly regulates federal law enforcement operations.
Reversing dismissal, the Sixth Circuit holds that an Oklahoma law firm's use of a default judgment to garnish a Michigan worker's wages establishes minimum contacts, reviving an FDCPA suit against the firm.
The court held that republishing an entire viral clip and using recognizable screenshots can defeat fair-use and de minimis defenses at the pleading stage, though it affirmed dismissal of claims tied to a YouTube-embedded interview.
Over the dissent of five judges, the full court leaves in place a panel ruling that the Equal Access to Justice Act waives sovereign immunity for attorney fees in habeas challenges to immigration detention, with dissenting judges warning the decision conflicts with circuit precedent and invites abuse.
A divided panel rules that environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe failed to show federal control or a final agency action over a state-funded immigration detention site, and holds part of the injunction violated a statutory bar on restraining immigration enforcement.
A divided panel lets part of a Second Amendment challenge to Colorado's unserialized firearm-parts law move forward, rejecting the state's view that possession restrictions are merely conditions on commercial sales while narrowing which claims plaintiffs may bring.
Affirming a disability benefits award against Reliance Standard, the court held that an untimely internal-appeal decision is not a valid exercise of fiduciary discretion—triggering de novo review even when the plan grants discretionary authority.
In Comanche Nation v. Ware, the court holds that IGRA's abrogation clause reaches suits by any tribe, not just compact parties, while Ex parte Young does not open the door to official-capacity RICO claims absent an enforcement connection.
A unanimous panel held that economist J. Gregory Sidak's suit against the International Trade Commission was neither too early nor too late, upholding a permanent injunction against an investigation built on an order from an ALJ whose appointment was never ratified.
A unanimous Supreme Court holds that substantial-evidence review, not de novo review, governs whether undisputed facts amount to persecution under the INA, resolving a circuit split and reaffirming Elias-Zacarias.
In a per curiam order, the Court found parents likely to prevail on free exercise and due process claims against policies that withhold student gender-transition information without child consent, drawing a sharp dissent over the emergency docket's use.
The court joins other circuits in holding that individualized vehicle-by-vehicle valuation questions predominate over common claims about State Farm's 'typical negotiation adjustment,' offering insurers a template for defeating Rule 23(b)(3) certification in actual-cash-value disputes.
In Thomas v. EOTech, a panel held that onboarding-paperwork limitations clauses cannot cut short the time Congress gave employees to sue under federal antidiscrimination law, though a parallel state-law claim still fell to the same clause.
A unanimous ruling in Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp. narrows the federal arm-of-the-state test to corporate form and formal liability for judgments, siding with New York over Pennsylvania and exposing quasi-public authorities with hundreds of millions in annual revenue to out-of-state suits.
The Court held that Boyle v. United Technologies does not immunize contractors from state tort claims when the military neither ordered nor authorized the challenged conduct, reversing the Fourth Circuit and reopening a wounded soldier's negligence suit against Fluor Corp.
The First Circuit vacated the BIA's denial of asylum for a Honduran man, ruling that resistance to gangs can constitute a political opinion depending on the context.
Court rules ITC's investigation into Gregory Sidak for violating a protective order was based on an unconstitutionally appointed ALJ's action.
A Fifth Circuit panel revived much of a former Godley, Texas, councilwoman's civil rights suit alleging city officials used a tampering charge to keep her from a key council vote.
A D.C. federal judge said Vanda Pharmaceuticals must press its Appointments Clause fight over FDA's refusal of its tradipitant application in the court of appeals, not district court.
The appeals court said a trial judge appeared to apply the wrong Rule 403 framework when excluding prior-conviction evidence in a child-exploitation prosecution.
A D.C. Circuit panel said EPA reasonably explained why steel mills needed more time to meet hazardous-emissions standards and dismissed procedural challenges to an interim rule that was later replaced by a final rule.
The panel said Jairo DeJesus was not entitled to acceptance-of-responsibility credit after trying to flee the country and later minimizing his culpability.
A divided D.C. Circuit stayed an order blocking the Pentagon's escort requirement for credentialed reporters, finding the government likely to prevail for now against a First Amendment retaliation challenge by The New York Times and reporter Julian Barnes.
The Seventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the Department of Veterans Affairs, finding a fired pharmacist lacked evidence that medication-error discipline masked race bias or retaliation.
Glenmark has agreed to a $29.6 million multistate settlement over allegations that it joined a long-running conspiracy to inflate prices and curb competition for generic prescription drugs.
A published Sixth Circuit panel said officers had reasonable suspicion to search a Michigan house tied to a supervised releasee, rejecting both suppression arguments and a constitutional attack on the federal felon-in-possession law.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta says a 19-attorney-general coalition wants to intervene in litigation challenging the U.S. Department of Defense's alleged freeze on land-based wind energy project reviews.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a Tax Court ruling that valued Savannah Shoals LLC's conservation easement at $480,000 and sustained a gross valuation misstatement penalty.
The Ninth Circuit declined to revisit a Second Amendment challenge to California's switchblade regulations, leaving intact a panel ruling that rejected a facial attack on the law.
The U.S. Supreme Court said Colorado's law regulating conversion therapy for minors likely targets protected speech when applied to a licensed counselor's talk therapy.
The justices said a D.C. appeals court improperly parsed the facts of an early-morning car stop rather than considering the full circumstances supporting reasonable suspicion.
A Ninth Circuit panel dismissed Nevada's appeal from an order vacating Lamar Brown's felony conviction, saying the state could not unwind a later misdemeanor plea deal it had already secured.
California's attorney general says a federal agreement to pay an Invenergy subsidiary to abandon a Central Coast offshore wind lease violates federal offshore leasing law.
Judge Randolph D. Moss said Brian Edward Moore appeared to have already received the release-related relief he sought and had previously lost on similar arguments.
The Second Circuit held that Switzerland's role in the UBS-Credit Suisse rescue was not commercial activity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, affirming dismissal of bondholders' claims over a $17.3 billion AT1 write-down.
A D.C. federal judge certified two damages classes in a renter's suit accusing Bozzuto Management Company of failing to disclose utility fees and overcharging tenants for water and sewer service.
A published Ninth Circuit panel held that murder-for-hire resulting in death is not categorically a crime of violence under the federal solicitation statute, requiring two convictions against James Terry Henrikson to be vacated.
A published panel ruling says a public PPP database and a company website did not, on this record, bar a qui tam suit accusing CalCon of misrepresenting its loan eligibility.
Oregon's attorney general said Glenmark will pay into a multistate generic-drug antitrust settlement, cooperate against remaining defendants and adopt competition compliance reforms.
A published panel said a distribution enhancement did not double count conduct already captured by the federal child pornography guideline.
The panel said likely success on a First Amendment retaliation claim did not eliminate the need to separately show irreparable harm.
The Federal Circuit let Dougherty Electric pursue one tax refund theory over IRS fraud penalties and interest, while rejecting a separate supervisor-approval theory as untimely.
A D.C. federal judge dismissed a former WMATA employee's wrongful termination claim, finding the transit agency was not immune from the suit but that the worker did not fit D.C.'s narrow public-policy exception for at-will employees.
The panel said the SBA acted within its emergency authority when it treated commonly controlled nursing homes as one corporate group for Paycheck Protection Program limits.
The panel said the SBA could apply a $20 million corporate-group limit to commonly controlled nursing homes seeking Paycheck Protection Program forgiveness.
The Seventh Circuit affirmed the Small Business Administration's use of a $20 million corporate-group cap to limit loan forgiveness for commonly controlled nursing homes that received pandemic-era PPP funds.
The panel said a defendant challenging a firearm-related sentencing enhancement showed error over a marijuana-possession predicate, but not the kind of plain error needed to undo his 77-month sentence.
A 42-state coalition reached an $18 million settlement with 23andMe’s bankruptcy trustee over allegations tied to the genetic-testing company’s 2023 data breach, according to Washington’s attorney general.
A D.C. federal judge allowed the American Petroleum Institute to intervene in NRDC's challenge to a national-security-based endangered species exemption for Gulf oil and gas operations.
The Federal Trade Commission said Caremark Rx and Zinc Health Services agreed to a proposed settlement requiring changes to pharmacy benefit manager practices tied to insulin rebates, pharmacy hubs and patient drug costs.
New York Attorney General Letitia James said a Suffolk County man collected more than $100,000 in Social Security disability benefits while posting weightlifting videos and advertising personal training work.
New York Attorney General Letitia James said a bipartisan multistate coalition secured payments and new data-security requirements after a breach affecting millions of 23andMe customers.
A former Clean the World Foundation employee should receive about half of the fees and costs he sought after only partially prevailing in his D.C. wage case, a magistrate judge recommended.
The New York attorney general said funds from 2021 lead-paint enforcement settlements will support free certification and rights training for more than 700 construction workers.
A D.C. federal judge refused to detain Ken Chiaen Chanlee before trial in a drug-trafficking case, finding release conditions could address prosecutors’ flight and safety concerns.
The justices reversed the Ninth Circuit and held that federal supervised release does not automatically extend when a defendant absconds.
The panel said the dog-import rule fits the CDC's inspection authority and was rationally tied to preventing rabies and vaccination-document fraud.
A District of Columbia federal judge granted a pro se plaintiff pauper status but dismissed his complaint without prejudice, finding its allegations too frivolous to support jurisdiction.
The Federal Trade Commission says the proposed settlement is the largest penalty ever for failing to make a required Hart-Scott-Rodino Act filing.
Oregon and 11 other states say Paramount Skydance's proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery would unlawfully shrink competition in movie distribution and basic cable programming.
New York Attorney General Letitia James and 14 other attorneys general say the U.S. Department of Education is trying to sidestep an earlier injunction by terminating school mental health grants under a new label.
The Tenth Circuit said a former Walmart employee presented enough evidence for a jury to hear his hostile-work-environment claim, while affirming the dismissal of his other discrimination-related theories.
The Eighth Circuit said officers lawfully stopped and searched Robert Lee Drayton Jr.'s car during a Cedar Rapids drug investigation, affirming the denial of his motion to suppress evidence tied to drug and firearm charges.
The panel said prosecutors needed only a preponderance showing that Keshon Baxter’s firearm possession fit a historical analogue, while a concurrence warned the circuit’s Section 922(g)(3) cases are drifting.
A D.C. federal court dismissed a grandmother's pro se complaint tied to an Illinois child custody matter, saying the dispute belonged in state court.
A District of Columbia federal judge dismissed a family's bid to force action on employment-based immigrant visa applications, finding the alleged delay did not state an unreasonable-delay claim under D.C. Circuit precedent.
A District of Columbia federal judge adopted a magistrate judge's recommendation and ordered a hearing officer to further explain parts of an IDEA decision involving extended school year services and compensatory education.
A published Fourth Circuit panel said a West Virginia marijuana-manufacturing conviction could count as a controlled substance offense under the sentencing guidelines despite the court's earlier Campbell ruling.
A published Fourth Circuit panel said Abitron changed the Lanham Act analysis but did not spare a Dutch software company from a preliminary injunction in a cross-border trademark and trade secrets fight.
A Fourth Circuit panel said the Supreme Court's Abitron trademark ruling did not undo an injunction against Dutch company DMARC Advisor because the record showed conduct directed at U.S. customers, not just overseas activity with domestic effects.
The panel affirmed a 15-year methamphetamine sentence, holding that the state-law label on an expungement does not decide whether a prior conviction counts under the federal Sentencing Guidelines.
A D.C. federal judge denied WPATH’s emergency bid to block the FTC from pursuing a separate enforcement suit in Texas, saying the group had not shown a threat to the court’s prior injunction or irreparable harm.
A D.C. federal magistrate judge said the adult-film copyright plaintiff may seek identifying information for a John Doe internet subscriber tied to alleged BitTorrent infringement.
A D.C. federal judge denied a former FAA engineer's attempts to revive previously dismissed claims while granting in part and denying in part the government's latest bid to end his pro se employment suit.
A D.C. federal judge granted the SBA administrator summary judgment in a former employee's FLSA suit over a small overtime dispute tied to the 2018 government shutdown.
The panel affirmed denials for two defendants seeking sentence cuts based on nonretroactive Section 924(c) amendments, applying the Supreme Court's new Rutherford ruling.
The panel said 1199 SEIU and home healthcare employers could not use a 2015 arbitration agreement to bind workers who had already left their jobs without consent.
The Second Circuit said former 1199 SEIU-represented home healthcare workers who left before a 2015 arbitration agreement are not bound by wage-and-hour arbitration awards confirmed in federal court.
The justices adopted an amendment to the federal hearsay rule that is slated to take effect Dec. 1, 2026, absent congressional action.
The U.S. Supreme Court asked the solicitor general to weigh in on two pending petitions and sent three cases back to federal appeals courts in a wide-ranging order list.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from a Supreme Court order barring an Indiana prisoner from future noncriminal in forma pauperis petitions, warning that the court's frequent-filer sanction is being applied too broadly to incarcerated litigants.
The panel said would-be intervenors could not plausibly defend Texas provisions giving in-state tuition access to students not lawfully present when out-of-state U.S. citizens did not receive the same benefit.
The U.S. Supreme Court said the Fourth Circuit failed to give proper AEDPA deference to a Maryland appellate ruling that rejected a convicted man's Brady materiality claim.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the court should have taken up whether indigent prisoners suing together must each pay a full federal filing fee.
The Fifth Circuit said neighbors challenging a New Orleans hospital’s relocated helipad must wait for final judgment before appealing a ruling that blocked their requested permanent injunction.
The Fifth Circuit said a Louisiana LLC that dissolved before suing Vendera and BOKF lacked capacity to bring its trade secrets and contract claims, but sent a sealing order back for a public-access analysis.
The justice dissented from the Supreme Court's refusal to hear a case asking when supervised-release violations can add prison time beyond the statutory maximum for the original crime.
Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Jackson, said the Supreme Court should have taken up James Skinner's case because his codefendant won relief over overlapping Brady evidence.
Judge Richard J. Leon said the plaintiffs did not oppose WMATA's partial dismissal bid and had not pleaded serious, verifiable emotional distress.
The Supreme Court ordered the Fifth Circuit to reconsider Grande Communications' dispute with UMG Recordings in light of the justices' Cox Communications ruling, while also issuing several other grant-vacate-remand orders.
The U.S. Supreme Court said a D.C. appellate court wrongly parsed reasonable suspicion factor by factor when it tossed a juvenile adjudication tied to a late-night vehicle stop.
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review whether the Department of Labor can adjudicate monetary-remedy proceedings against employers accused of violating employment terms for H-2A and corresponding domestic workers.
A federal judge said Paul Bishop's latest Title VII complaint cleared the low pleading bar after he alleged the Agriculture Department deemed him qualified but chose a white female candidate instead.
The U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari after Michael Lairy received relief from a prison term Justice Sonia Sotomayor said exceeded the lawful maximum by five years.
The panel upheld convictions and sentences for three defendants while a concurrence warned that a phone-extraction PowerPoint and gang testimony pushed evidentiary limits.
The U.S. Supreme Court vacated an Eleventh Circuit decision against Florida death row prisoner Gary Whitton, saying the appeals court relied on DNA evidence the trial jury never heard when assessing the effect of allegedly false informant testimony.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor said Mississippi's rule for proving prejudice from counsel's mishandling of a Batson challenge is likely wrong, but the case was not a proper vehicle for review.
The Supreme Court declined to hear two disputes that Justice Samuel Alito said warranted review, including a student-speech fight over anti-abortion club flyers and an Alabama capital case involving a prosecutor's closing argument.
The Seventh Circuit held that an Illinois man shot with nonlethal police rounds during a standoff failed to identify clearly established law defeating qualified immunity.
Justice Neil Gorsuch said the Supreme Court should soon reconsider a century-old precedent holding that the Seventh Amendment civil jury trial right does not bind the states.
The justices added three cases to their merits docket while putting off a mootness request in Little v. Hecox until oral argument.
The U.S. Supreme Court denied review in a case asking it to reconsider United States v. Kagama, drawing a dissent from Justice Neil Gorsuch that attacked federal Indian-law plenary power doctrine.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review a challenge to a New Orleans jail-construction order, prompting a dissent that said lower courts misapplied the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
The justices reversed a Louisiana appellate ruling that applied a state public-health emergency immunity statute to defeat federal claims against a physical therapy provider.
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review whether the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably found that a petitioner waived his chance to rebut prosecutors’ race-neutral explanations for peremptory strikes against four Black jurors.
The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in several matters, including a Cisco case limited to two questions and consolidated FCC-related petitions set for one hour of argument.
The justices agreed to hear four cases, including a Monsanto dispute over whether federal pesticide law preempts a label-based failure-to-warn claim when EPA has not required the warning.
The administrative stay remains in place until May 11 while a response to GenBioPro's application is due May 7.
Justice Samuel Alito issued an administrative stay of a Fifth Circuit order while the Supreme Court awaits a response to Danco Laboratories' application.
The U.S. Supreme Court denied a recall motion in two pending Callais matters and appointed a Washington lawyer to argue a sentencing-guidelines deference issue in Beaird v. United States.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. stayed a D.C. Circuit mandate involving Catherine Herridge while the Supreme Court considers a stay application.
A Fourth Circuit panel said a Virginia prisoner's Free Exercise damages claim must return to district court for a Turner analysis after officials denied him a diet that met both his Ramadan fasting and kosher-supervision beliefs.
A published Fourth Circuit panel revived key parts of a challenge to South Carolina's race-related curriculum budget proviso, sending standing questions and an author's book-removal claim back to the district court.
The Seventh Circuit affirmed a wire fraud and money laundering conviction, holding that using a defendant’s own discovery production as one circumstance to authenticate incriminating messages did not violate his right to testify.
The panel said a Southern District of Texas plea agreement did not block a later Central District of Illinois wire fraud conspiracy prosecution.
The Seventh Circuit rejected the government’s bid to dismiss two noncitizens’ petitions as untimely, holding they can invoke equitable tolling after the U.S. Supreme Court reset the filing clock for withholding-only proceedings.
A Seventh Circuit panel held that a Southern District of Texas plea agreement with Babajide Adefusi bound only that U.S. Attorney's Office, leaving federal prosecutors in Illinois free to pursue a later wire fraud conspiracy case.
The panel said an Illinois trooper's motives could matter when a commercial-trucking inspection is used to justify a warrantless stop.
The panel affirmed the defeat of Becky Spengler's Title VII and equal protection claims but said her public-employee compelled-belief theory was sufficiently pleaded.
The U.S. Supreme Court partly granted a request for divided argument and expanded time while denying an amici bid to take part.
The justices asked the parties to address how a disputed statutory phrase affects 10 U.S.C. § 12406(3) before acting on a stay request.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor recalled and stayed a Second Circuit mandate while the Supreme Court considers an application from a class representative for judgment creditors of the Ferdinand Marcos estate.
Deputy Assistant Attorney General Dina Kallay said patents, including standard-essential patents, should not be treated as automatic market-power proof and defended injunction access for patent owners.
The emergency order gives the First Circuit time to rule on the government’s bid to stay Rhode Island federal court directives requiring full November SNAP funding.
A published panel held that the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act did not reach claims and a workplace dispute that arose before the statute took effect.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor denied a stay request after the government said disputed funds would remain in the United States while any certiorari petition is pending.
The proposed settlement would require Deere to give farmers and independent repair providers access to repair tools and software capabilities it provides to authorized dealers.
The panel affirmed more than $793,000 in attorneys' fees for surface landowners, while a concurrence said the district court's lodestar analysis erred but did not warrant reversal.
A D.C. federal judge stayed Julie Beberman's case while a related Virgin Islands action over Foreign Service grievance proceedings may be transferred to Washington.
Oregon's attorney general says Paramount Skydance has not complied with a state records request tied to review of its proposed Warner Bros. Discovery acquisition.
The justices said the government had not yet shown irreparable harm, but left room for a renewed request if discovery begins before a forthcoming certiorari petition is resolved.
Justice Samuel Alito issued an administrative stay of two Third Circuit orders while the Supreme Court awaits a response to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette's application.
A D.C. Circuit panel refused to pause an order requiring President Donald Trump's name to be removed from Kennedy Center signage, website references and related trademark applications, finding no showing of irreparable harm.
The Supreme Court denied review in a Humboldt County case, but Justice Gorsuch said the justices should soon reconsider precedent refusing to apply the Seventh Amendment civil jury right to the states.
The justices declined to stop Anthony Boyd's execution by nitrogen hypoxia, over a three-justice dissent saying the method risks minutes of conscious suffocation.
The justices declined to revisit United States v. Kagama, drawing a dissent that said the precedent's theory of federal plenary power over tribal affairs lacks a constitutional foundation.
The justices stayed a lower-court order blocking Texas’ mid-decade redistricting plan, splitting over whether the state’s new map reflected partisan line-drawing or unconstitutional racial gerrymandering.
The justices stayed a lower-court injunction blocking Texas' congressional redistricting plan, saying the state was likely to show serious errors in the racial-gerrymandering ruling.
The justice concurred in denying certiorari but said a district court was wrong to think federal judges are barred from explaining the criminal burden of proof.
The justices held that candidates have standing to challenge vote-counting rules in their own elections, sending Rep. Michael Bost's challenge to Illinois' post-election mail-ballot receipt deadline back to the lower courts.
The justices said one act that violates both 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and § 924(j) can support only one conviction absent clear congressional authorization.
The Supreme Court held that Rule 60's reasonable-time deadline applies even when a litigant argues a judgment is void.
A Washington, D.C., federal judge dismissed a pro se prisoner's sprawling civil rights case against the U.S. government, finding some allegations too insubstantial for federal jurisdiction and the rest too incoherent to proceed.
A former union employee may add a Section 1981 race-discrimination claim over a COVID-19 vaccine policy rollout, but a D.C. federal judge rejected her bid to add several other theories.
A D.C. federal judge let a former International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers employee expand his race discrimination case over his firing under a COVID-19 vaccine policy, but refused to revive or add several other employment, tort and labor-law claims.
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously revived an ex post facto challenge to a federal restitution order, holding that Mandatory Victims Restitution Act restitution counts as criminal punishment.
The justices said AEDPA required deference to a Maryland court's finding that an undisclosed forensic report was not material to Charles Brandon Martin's conviction.
The justices paused a New York trial-court order requiring a new congressional district while state appeals proceed, drawing sharp disagreement over race, jurisdiction and election timing.
The U.S. Supreme Court said Heck v. Humphrey does not bar a Section 1983 suit seeking only prospective relief from future enforcement of a city ordinance.
The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit and held a Vermont police sergeant was entitled to qualified immunity in a Fourth Amendment suit over his use of a rear wristlock during a state capitol sit-in.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented from the Supreme Court's refusal to take up Rodney Reed's latest bid for DNA testing in his Texas death-penalty case.
The justices said an internet provider is not contributorily liable for users' infringement merely because it kept providing service after receiving infringement notices.
Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Jackson, said the Supreme Court should have reviewed James Skinner's bid for the same Brady relief his codefendant previously won.
The panel said a Massachusetts defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in Freenet Opennet requests that law enforcement received and logged through a peer-to-peer monitoring tool.
The justices said Chevron plausibly tied challenged World War II crude-oil production to federal aviation-gasoline refining duties, vacating a Fifth Circuit remand ruling.
The justices said a D.C. officer had reasonable suspicion to stop a juvenile driver after a late-night suspicious-vehicle call, two passengers fled and the car began backing out with a door open.
The panel said a former DEA employee failed to show that her firing for insubordination and alleged lack of candor was a pretext for retaliation.
The panel told defense counsel to explain why Joseph Harris’ guilty plea, appeal waiver and potential appellate issues leave no arguable basis for relief before it rules on withdrawal.
The panel said a Gambian man's methamphetamine conviction remained a particularly serious crime that barred withholding of removal despite his challenge to Chevron-era precedent.
A Third Circuit panel said Dr. Norman Wang can press key defamation and retaliation claims over the fallout from his article criticizing race-conscious policies in medical training.
The justice said the standard for reviewing whether a child is well settled under the Hague Convention has divided federal appeals courts, but changed circumstances made the case a poor vehicle for review.
The Supreme Court held that the 30-day deadline for removing civil cases to federal court cannot be equitably tolled, sending Michigan's Line 5 lawsuit against Enbridge back to state court.
The Federal Trade Commission will host a May 20 workshop on litigate-the-fix merger remedy proposals, with FTC and DOJ officials among the expected participants.
The FTC said 365 Retail must sell Cantaloupe's Three Square Market business to Seaga to resolve concerns that the micromarket kiosk deal would raise prices and weaken interoperability competition.
The panel said evidence of force, fear and corroborating injuries supported the jury's verdict against Ellery Zephier Sr.
The Eighth Circuit said two Kansas City detectives and a prosecutor must face claims tied to an overturned murder conviction that kept Keith Carnes imprisoned for 18 years.
Federal antitrust enforcers called on state attorneys general to pursue potential petroleum-market collusion, retail price manipulation and consumer protection violations tied to high gas prices.
The U.S. Supreme Court said the FAAAA's motor-vehicle safety exception saves a negligent-hiring claim against C.H. Robinson from federal preemption.
The D.C. Circuit affirmed convictions and prison terms for two men tied to a scheme that used cash bribes to slash D.C. business tax bills, finding any flaw in the bribery instructions harmless.
The D.C. Circuit partly reversed a $13 million pension-liability judgment, finding one delinquent-contribution theory was not properly pleaded and sending disputed personal-liability issues back for further proceedings.
The antitrust agencies gave stakeholders until May 21 to weigh in on potential updates to guidance for collaborations among competitors.
The U.S. Supreme Court stayed a Fifth Circuit order that had suspended 2023 FDA mifepristone dispensing changes, drawing dissents from Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito over emergency relief for the drug's manufacturers.
The panel said an Illinois federal judge properly treated Malaia Turner as a leader in a methamphetamine conspiracy and found no reversible error in the drug-quantity calculations used at sentencing.
The new FTC group will coordinate healthcare enforcement and advocacy across the agency's competition, consumer protection, economics, policy and technology arms.
The U.S. Department of Justice said a proposed consent decree would bar Willow Bridge from using certain competitor-data-driven pricing algorithms and from sharing competitively sensitive rental information with rivals.
The justice concurred in denying certiorari after the government said it had mistakenly fought Michael Lairy's challenge to a prison term five years above the statutory maximum.
The panel said a Decatur, Illinois, traffic stop was valid, the dog sniff did not unlawfully prolong it, and the evidence was enough to show constructive possession.
The agency said the pest-control company must stop enforcing noncompete agreements and notify current and former workers they can compete.
The antitrust agencies are weighing updated guidance after the 2000 competitor collaboration guidelines were withdrawn in late 2024.
The Supreme Court said cruise lines may face Title III liability for using Havana port docks confiscated after the Cuban Revolution, even though Havana Docks' concession would have expired before the cruises at issue.
The panel said threats and an assault by Serbian soccer hooligans reflected personal and performance-related grievances, not persecution tied to a protected ground.
Northrop Grumman is asking the Federal Trade Commission to reopen and set aside a 2018 consent order that imposed supply and firewall obligations after its Orbital ATK acquisition.
FTC staff told Tennessee lawmakers that allowing Ballad Health's COPA to expire before easing hospital-entry barriers could expose patients to higher costs, lower quality and reduced access to care.
The Justice Department says a former Air Force master sergeant helped steer inflated Pacific Air Forces IT contracts in a yearslong scheme that caused at least $37 million in overpayments.
The agency said the consent order resolves concerns that Valvoline's purchase of Greenbriar outlets would eliminate competition in 25 local quick-lube markets.
The justices held 6-3 that prisoners cannot use Congress' nonretroactive reduction of Section 924(c) firearm-stacking penalties as an extraordinary and compelling reason for compassionate release.
Acting antitrust chief Omeed A. Assefi told an NYU audience that the Justice Department wants candid merger engagement, structural fixes where they work and courtroom fights where they do not.
The Justice Department said a proposed Minnesota federal court settlement would curb Agri Stats' exchange of competitively sensitive meat-industry data and impose monitoring and compliance obligations.
The U.S. Supreme Court vacated an Eleventh Circuit habeas ruling for relying on post-trial DNA evidence when judging whether disputed jailhouse-informant testimony influenced a Florida murder jury.
The justices unanimously held that Amarin did not plausibly allege Hikma actively encouraged infringement of Vascepa cardiovascular-use patents.
A senior Antitrust Division official said competitors using algorithms, SaaS platforms or large language models to coordinate pricing can still face criminal scrutiny when the evidence shows an agreement.
The Federal Trade Commission said Aurobindo must sell four generic drug products to resolve competition concerns over its proposed acquisition of Lannett.
Taiheiyo Cement and CalPortland must divest three San Diego County ready-mix concrete plants to proceed with CalPortland's planned $712 million purchase of Vulcan assets, the DOJ said.
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the Ninth Circuit, holding that the SEC may obtain disgorgement without first proving investors suffered pecuniary losses.
The Federal Trade Commission said it reached an agreement in principle with U.S. Anesthesia Partners to resolve litigation over an alleged Texas anesthesia roll-up, but the settlement terms remain confidential and still require further approvals.
The Antitrust Division said the Defense Production Act approvals allow domestic nuclear energy companies to coordinate on fuel-supply capacity while remaining subject to federal monitoring.
The Federal Trade Commission said Ascension must divest seven ambulatory surgery centers to resolve allegations that its proposed $3.9 billion AmSurg acquisition would harm outpatient surgical services competition.
The Justice Department said a proposed settlement would resolve its antitrust suit over OhioHealth contract provisions that allegedly blocked lower-cost commercial health insurance options.
The agency said the proposed acquisition would have combined the two leading FLACS laser-system competitors and threatened price and innovation competition.
The Seventh Circuit rejected the federal government's bid to toss two noncitizens' petitions for review as untimely, holding that equitable tolling can preserve post-Riley challenges tied to withholding-only and CAT proceedings.
Four major shipping-container manufacturers and seven executives were charged in a criminal antitrust case alleging they restricted output and fixed prices for standard dry containers.
The Federal Trade Commission said Sevita must divest 128 intermediate care facilities and related assets to Dungarvin to resolve merger concerns in three states.
The Federal Trade Commission says Rollins must stop enforcing noncompete agreements against more than 18,000 workers and is warning other pest-control employers to review similar restrictions.
The Federal Trade Commission said a Texas federal court approved consent orders resolving allegations that major advertising agencies coordinated common brand-safety standards for digital advertising.
FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson and Commissioner Mark R. Meador told a Senate committee the agency is pursuing consumer-protection and competition priorities including healthcare markets, labor practices, deceptive fees and online abuse enforcement preparations.
Oregon's attorney general said LivCor has agreed to a $7 million settlement in state antitrust litigation accusing landlords of using RealPage software to align apartment rents through competitively sensitive pricing data.
The Federal Trade Commission approved a final consent order requiring 365 Retail Markets to divest a Cantaloupe micromarket kiosk business and provide nondiscriminatory software-hardware integrations.
The justices held that federal pesticide law preempts a Missouri failure-to-warn claim seeking a cancer warning on Roundup's EPA-approved label.
The Justice Department said the plea is the first in an ongoing probe of bid rigging and fraud affecting U.S. military facilities.
The Justice Department says two Florida defense contractors schemed to corrupt a competitive procurement process for a military technology innovation campus in the Pacific.
The antitrust agencies are weighing whether to pursue new rulemaking on premerger reporting after a court vacated the updated Hart-Scott-Rodino form and an appeals court declined to pause that ruling.
The U.S. Supreme Court held that asylum seekers stopped in Mexico have not 'arrived in the United States' under key immigration statutes until they cross the border.
Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson, dissented from the Supreme Court’s refusal to take up Victor Saldaño’s bid for review of his intellectual-disability claim.
Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, said the court should have reviewed whether state law can automatically create an undue-hardship defense to religious-accommodation claims under Title VII.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Alan Dershowitz's defamation fight with Cable News Network, Inc., but two justices said the case was a vehicle to revisit the actual-malice standard for public figures.
Justice Sotomayor urged lower courts to weigh the Supreme Court's recent waiver reasoning before enforcing appeal or collateral-review waivers against defendants challenging their convictions.
A Fifth Circuit panel affirmed summary judgment for Louisiana in drugmakers’ challenge to a state law protecting 340B contract-pharmacy distribution.
The panel said two noncitizens seeking withholding-only or Convention Against Torture protection may use equitable tolling to overcome Riley's 30-day filing rule.
The panel said two Massachusetts cocaine convictions did not qualify as federal guideline controlled substance offenses because the state definition was broader than the federal drug schedules.
The appeals court said Robert Lynn failed to show that Bank of New York Mellon’s stated reasons for eliminating his role masked race discrimination or retaliation.
The panel affirmed a firearms sentence after holding that Minnesota third-degree murder qualifies as generic murder under the federal sentencing guidelines.
The Tenth Circuit held that Kansas consumers' storm-pricing claims against wholesale natural-gas suppliers are field-preempted by the Natural Gas Act.
The en banc Eleventh Circuit held that an Alabama sex-offender residency law burdens a fundamental parental right, sending the dispute back to a panel for further proceedings.
The Fourth Circuit said jurors should have been instructed that bodily injury under a federal civil-rights statute must be a proximate result of the defendant's conduct.
A split Fourth Circuit said jurors needed a proximate-cause instruction before finding that a former prison official's civil rights violation resulted in bodily injury, while leaving false-statement convictions intact.
A Fourth Circuit panel said two detention officers were not entitled to qualified immunity at this stage over allegations they delayed checking on an inmate they suspected had been beaten.
The panel said federal courts owed AEDPA deference to state-court rulings rejecting K.C. Langford's speedy-trial and ineffective-assistance claims.
The Fourth Circuit affirmed the denial of compassionate release for a federal prisoner with end-stage renal disease, holding that courts must assess whether the condition is terminal on the defendant-specific record.
The First Circuit ordered Maine officials to face a preliminary injunction against one religious-expression rule while largely rejecting St. Dominic Academy's bid to block other anti-discrimination requirements tied to public tuition funding.
The panel said a Kentucky federal court violated criminal forfeiture timing rules but that the mistakes did not justify vacating Jeremy Wayne Harrell's forfeiture sentence.
The Fifth Circuit said a felon-in-possession defendant could keep challenging two supervised-release conditions tied to a later revocation, then struck them because they were not properly pronounced in court.
A divided Ninth Circuit said federal energy-efficiency law does not preempt Southern California air regulators’ zero-emissions appliance rule adopted to meet Clean Air Act ozone obligations.
The panel said a state court reasonably found that an improperly admitted confession was harmless despite a Miranda violation.
The panel said landowners' challenge to a 15% administrative fee on interest from court-held condemnation funds was void because it ran into Puerto Rico's Title III automatic stay.
The panel said counsel's second-degree murder strategy did not trigger McCoy structural error or Cronic presumed prejudice in Kyle Quentin Sago's postconviction bid.
The Third Circuit said a firearm with one illegible serial number can trigger a four-level Guidelines enhancement even if another serial number on the gun remains readable.
The Seventh Circuit affirmed Luisito Espanola's wire fraud and money laundering convictions, holding that using his own discovery production as part of the authentication analysis did not violate his right to testify.
The Eighth Circuit held that the government cannot use the Debt Collection Improvement Act to sidestep the five-year limitations period for collecting OSHA civil penalties.
The panel rejected the federal government's new reading of immigration detention law, deepening a fast-moving circuit split over mandatory detention for noncitizens arrested inside the U.S.