On April 24, 2026, the plaintiff notified chambers that a notice of voluntary dismissal filed on April 20 was not duplicative, but rather an amendment intended to dismiss only her individual claims.
The April 20 notice sought dismissal with prejudice as to Blalock’s individual claims and without prejudice as to the claims of the putative class members.
The court had previously issued an order on April 21 directing the clerk to disregard that notice as duplicative of a prior filing from April 15.
Upon learning of the error, the magistrate judge vacated the April 21 order as having been issued in mistake.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the court dismissed the action with prejudice as to Blalock’s individual claims and without prejudice as to the class claims.
The case remains pending for the putative class, allowing the dispute over Personify Health’s conduct to proceed despite the plaintiff’s personal exit from the litigation.