Sixth Circuit Lets TVA Keep Building $2.5 Billion Gas Plant During NEPA Appeal
A Sixth Circuit panel paused a ruling that voided TVA's approval of its Kingston gas plant, finding the agency likely to win on alternatives, precommitment and remedy.
A Sixth Circuit panel paused a ruling that voided TVA's approval of its Kingston gas plant, finding the agency likely to win on alternatives, precommitment and remedy.
A divided panel held that Helling v. McKinney barred officials from ignoring pervasive mold at Huron Valley but granted immunity to five senior administrators.
A unanimous panel held that Sen. James C. Justice II's guaranty covers every premium his family's coal companies missed, not just $3.5 million owed when he signed.
A 2-1 panel held that a daughter plausibly alleged Knox County failed to train jail staff on overdoses after at least ten employees ignored her dying father's symptoms.
Panel rules Michigan tolling law ran continuously through class action's dismissal and reopening, sends notice question back to district court.
A nurse failed to plausibly allege her employer's counterclaims seeking repayment of a sign-on bonus were objectively baseless, the appeals court held.
A divided panel holds that the accessibility regulation requires compliant doors but not wheelchair-accessible routes, declining to defer to DOJ commentary.
Panel declines to extend Hartman and Nieves probable-cause rules to minor civil enforcement actions like parking tickets.
The appeals court held that pharmacy benefit managers' integrated federal and commercial negotiations support removal under the federal officer statute.
The appeals court affirmed Ohio's denial of a preliminary injunction and vacated Tennessee's grant, holding that prediction market contracts are not protected from state gaming laws.
The panel held that the Village of St. Bernard's remaining billboard rules survive intermediate scrutiny and are severable from the invalidated public-service sign carve-out, offering guidance on Ohio severance law.
Panel says the district court should have declined supplemental jurisdiction over an unresolved Michigan constitutional issue after dismissing the federal claims.
The panel held disputed issues about whether a man with schizoaffective disorder posed a threat must go to the jury, and the officer could not relitigate facts on interlocutory appeal.
Reversing dismissal, the Sixth Circuit holds that an Oklahoma law firm's use of a default judgment to garnish a Michigan worker's wages establishes minimum contacts, reviving an FDCPA suit against the firm.
The court joins other circuits in holding that individualized vehicle-by-vehicle valuation questions predominate over common claims about State Farm's 'typical negotiation adjustment,' offering insurers a template for defeating Rule 23(b)(3) certification in actual-cash-value disputes.
A published Sixth Circuit panel said officers had reasonable suspicion to search a Michigan house tied to a supervised releasee, rejecting both suppression arguments and a constitutional attack on the federal felon-in-possession law.
The panel told defense counsel to explain why Joseph Harris’ guilty plea, appeal waiver and potential appellate issues leave no arguable basis for relief before it rules on withdrawal.
The panel said a Kentucky federal court violated criminal forfeiture timing rules but that the mistakes did not justify vacating Jeremy Wayne Harrell's forfeiture sentence.