Ninth Circuit Keeps Sliding-Scale Injunction Test Over 10-Judge Dissent
The court declined to rehear a disability case; Judge Bress and nine colleagues said its 'serious questions' test conflicts with Winter and Starbucks.
The court declined to rehear a disability case; Judge Bress and nine colleagues said its 'serious questions' test conflicts with Winter and Starbucks.
A two-judge quorum vacated a verdict for a Louisiana parish in a free-speech suit, citing repeated defense misconduct and the judge's use of a juror's press remarks.
A divided panel held the Tucker Act did not require dismissal of Fairfax County and Arlington challenges to the Education Department's enforcement of Title IX.
A diner who paid for premium local snapper at a restaurant that admitted selling over 29 tons of imported frozen fish as local premium species has plausibly alleged an injury in fact, the court held.
Physicians and physician assistants practice in substantially similar fields under Iowa's expert-qualification law, the court held, reviving a missed-diverticulitis suit.
The court held that good cause to end a car dealer's franchise is judged when the state board decides, so a dealer's gains during a four-year wait counted.
A divided court told a Monroe County judge to vacate an order requiring seven depositions and to rule first on a bid to send a contract fight to New York.
A Fifth Circuit panel vacated the FCC's fourth-quarter 2025 universal service contribution factor, holding the agency created USAC without the authorization a 1945 law requires.
The unanimous court said a truck driver who slipped at a self-service fueling station could show notice with evidence that the spill was a reasonably foreseeable risk.
The court held that Ohio's refiling statute saves a whole lawsuit rather than single claims and has no one-use limit, reviving negligence claims against Glenmede Trust.
A divided court rejected a referee's not-guilty recommendation and found Clayton Bowers Studstill violated Bar rules on candor and on obeying a court's instructions.
The justices stayed a Fourth Circuit mandamus order, reasoning that a court may not force the FCC to end its deliberations on a two-day deadline.
The First District upheld a $520,000 negligence judgment against spine surgeon Abubakar Atiq Durrani but held the trial court had no basis to award attorney fees.
A Fifth Circuit panel refused to let defendants facing a judgment of more than $210 million halt collection during their appeal by posting a $25 million bond.
A unanimous court held that Idaho's open-range law protects a cow's owner even on a fenced interstate and that the state owed the injured driver no duty.
A divided Arkansas Supreme Court held that Costco's Kirkland Signature label is one brand, so every supplier must use the wholesaler chosen first.
The trial court violated due process by shifting 30% of the fault to nonparty male students whom the State never blamed, the justices held, restoring $4.25 million.
The court held that a Mississippi seller that made more than 1,000 deliveries into Michigan could be sued there, and that its website terms did not shield it.
The Fifth District affirmed an order voiding a $55,000 car-crash verdict after two jurors swore the panel discussed the defendant's wealth and insurance.
A state appeals panel ordered a San Bernardino County court to quash service on Fanuc Corp., holding California courts lack jurisdiction over the Japanese robot maker.
Concurring in a mandamus denial, Justice Kyle D. Hawkins wrote that Rule 592 addresses property and that the court should intervene in an appropriate case if trial courts use it to jail deponents again.
The label's press release naming two women who sued under pseudonyms was protected, the court held, because they never asked a judge for permission to stay anonymous.
A 3-2 appeals panel held that Bill Cosby's alleged use of the Cosby Show set to win a woman's trust did not make Carsey-Werner liable for his alleged assaults.
The Fourth DCA held that a party may win appellate fees as a sanction for an opponent's fabricated case law, making the plaintiffs and their lawyer jointly liable.
A First District panel held a Leon County grand jury overstepped by calling a $10 million Centene payment to Hope Florida "misappropriated" while charging no one.
The Second Department said owners of vacant residential lots may use article 78 to fix city tax class errors, declining to follow a First Department ruling.
Deciding the question for the first time, the court sided with Sandoz on a briefing rule while vacating its $61.6 million contract award against United Therapeutics.
The Third District held that a psychologist's petition to end her five-year probation early gets deferential substantial-evidence review, not independent judgment.
Consumers have standing to attack DOE's 2024 dishwasher and clothes-washer water limits, the Fifth Circuit held, but the case cannot be heard first in district court.
Joining the Fourth and Eleventh Circuits, the Fifth Circuit held that appealing a federal-officer remand automatically stays the remand order while the appeal proceeds.
In a concurrence, Judge Ho responds to emails referencing a U.S. Senator sent to a magistrate under consideration for a district court seat.
Per curiam opinion holds that LLC citizenship traces to every member, not the place-of-formation rules that govern corporations.
A federal court that dismisses a case for lack of Article III jurisdiction cannot adjudicate a contract-based fee request and must dismiss it outright.
The panel joins three sister circuits in rejecting an all-or-nothing approach to supplemental jurisdiction while reviving a malicious-prosecution claim against Walmart.
The appeals court held that pharmacy benefit managers' integrated federal and commercial negotiations support removal under the federal officer statute.
In Comanche Nation v. Ware, the court holds that IGRA's abrogation clause reaches suits by any tribe, not just compact parties, while Ex parte Young does not open the door to official-capacity RICO claims absent an enforcement connection.
Court rules ITC's investigation into Gregory Sidak for violating a protective order was based on an unconstitutionally appointed ALJ's action.
A D.C. federal judge said Vanda Pharmaceuticals must press its Appointments Clause fight over FDA's refusal of its tradipitant application in the court of appeals, not district court.
The Ninth Circuit declined to revisit a Second Amendment challenge to California's switchblade regulations, leaving intact a panel ruling that rejected a facial attack on the law.
Judge Randolph D. Moss said Brian Edward Moore appeared to have already received the release-related relief he sought and had previously lost on similar arguments.
A published panel ruling says a public PPP database and a company website did not, on this record, bar a qui tam suit accusing CalCon of misrepresenting its loan eligibility.
The panel said the SBA acted within its emergency authority when it treated commonly controlled nursing homes as one corporate group for Paycheck Protection Program limits.
The panel said the SBA could apply a $20 million corporate-group limit to commonly controlled nursing homes seeking Paycheck Protection Program forgiveness.
The panel said the dog-import rule fits the CDC's inspection authority and was rationally tied to preventing rabies and vaccination-document fraud.
A District of Columbia federal judge granted a pro se plaintiff pauper status but dismissed his complaint without prejudice, finding its allegations too frivolous to support jurisdiction.
A District of Columbia federal judge adopted a magistrate judge's recommendation and ordered a hearing officer to further explain parts of an IDEA decision involving extended school year services and compensatory education.
The justices adopted an amendment to the federal hearsay rule that is slated to take effect Dec. 1, 2026, absent congressional action.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the court should have taken up whether indigent prisoners suing together must each pay a full federal filing fee.
The Fifth Circuit said neighbors challenging a New Orleans hospital’s relocated helipad must wait for final judgment before appealing a ruling that blocked their requested permanent injunction.
Judge Richard J. Leon said the plaintiffs did not oppose WMATA's partial dismissal bid and had not pleaded serious, verifiable emotional distress.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor said Mississippi's rule for proving prejudice from counsel's mishandling of a Batson challenge is likely wrong, but the case was not a proper vehicle for review.
The justices reversed a Louisiana appellate ruling that applied a state public-health emergency immunity statute to defeat federal claims against a physical therapy provider.
Justice Samuel Alito issued an administrative stay of a Fifth Circuit order while the Supreme Court awaits a response to Danco Laboratories' application.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. stayed a D.C. Circuit mandate involving Catherine Herridge while the Supreme Court considers a stay application.
The U.S. Supreme Court partly granted a request for divided argument and expanded time while denying an amici bid to take part.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor recalled and stayed a Second Circuit mandate while the Supreme Court considers an application from a class representative for judgment creditors of the Ferdinand Marcos estate.
The emergency order gives the First Circuit time to rule on the government’s bid to stay Rhode Island federal court directives requiring full November SNAP funding.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor denied a stay request after the government said disputed funds would remain in the United States while any certiorari petition is pending.
The panel affirmed more than $793,000 in attorneys' fees for surface landowners, while a concurrence said the district court's lodestar analysis erred but did not warrant reversal.
A D.C. federal judge stayed Julie Beberman's case while a related Virgin Islands action over Foreign Service grievance proceedings may be transferred to Washington.
The Supreme Court denied review in a Humboldt County case, but Justice Gorsuch said the justices should soon reconsider precedent refusing to apply the Seventh Amendment civil jury right to the states.
The justices held that candidates have standing to challenge vote-counting rules in their own elections, sending Rep. Michael Bost's challenge to Illinois' post-election mail-ballot receipt deadline back to the lower courts.
The justices said Chevron plausibly tied challenged World War II crude-oil production to federal aviation-gasoline refining duties, vacating a Fifth Circuit remand ruling.
The justice said the standard for reviewing whether a child is well settled under the Hague Convention has divided federal appeals courts, but changed circumstances made the case a poor vehicle for review.
The Supreme Court held that the 30-day deadline for removing civil cases to federal court cannot be equitably tolled, sending Michigan's Line 5 lawsuit against Enbridge back to state court.
The FTC said 365 Retail must sell Cantaloupe's Three Square Market business to Seaga to resolve concerns that the micromarket kiosk deal would raise prices and weaken interoperability competition.
The U.S. Supreme Court said the FAAAA's motor-vehicle safety exception saves a negligent-hiring claim against C.H. Robinson from federal preemption.
The Supreme Court said cruise lines may face Title III liability for using Havana port docks confiscated after the Cuban Revolution, even though Havana Docks' concession would have expired before the cruises at issue.
Northrop Grumman is asking the Federal Trade Commission to reopen and set aside a 2018 consent order that imposed supply and firewall obligations after its Orbital ATK acquisition.
The Eighth Circuit held that the government cannot use the Debt Collection Improvement Act to sidestep the five-year limitations period for collecting OSHA civil penalties.