California Appeals Court Upholds Partner's Half Share of Pension Earned Before Marriage
A state appeals court held that a law shielding East Bay utility pensions from assignment does not block a partner's claim under a cohabitation agreement.
A state appeals court held that a law shielding East Bay utility pensions from assignment does not block a partner's claim under a cohabitation agreement.
The Sixth District gave Proposition 218's emergency exception its ordinary meaning and deferred to the county board's findings on federal funding cuts.
A Hermosa Beach officer fired for failing the city's COVID-19 vaccination requirement had no right to a POBRA administrative appeal, a state appeals court held.
The Fifth District reversed a writ ordering CalGEM to exempt up to 12 Kern County wastewater injection wells from CEQA and declared a grandfathering rule invalid.
A state appeals court held that a contractor's false insurance applications let Scottsdale void its policies, leaving California's Military Department without coverage.
Probate courts' equitable power to shift fees onto a bad-faith beneficiary protects the trust estate, not a trustee who pays to defend herself, the Fourth District held.
The Second District affirmed a judgment for the UC Regents, holding the law governs an employer's process, not its judgment that a conviction relates to the job.
The Fifth District affirmed an order voiding a $55,000 car-crash verdict after two jurors swore the panel discussed the defendant's wealth and insurance.
The Second District held that Medi-Cal may recover from a dead member's estate only what was paid for care the member received, and voided the state's regulation.
A state appeals panel ordered a San Bernardino County court to quash service on Fanuc Corp., holding California courts lack jurisdiction over the Japanese robot maker.
The label's press release naming two women who sued under pseudonyms was protected, the court held, because they never asked a judge for permission to stay anonymous.
A state appellate panel said residents adequately alleged Stanton bought and razed fourplexes over 17 years without the replacement housing state law requires.
An appeals panel affirmed summary judgment for Burbank Unified, holding indefinite unpaid leave was a reasonable FEHA accommodation of a teacher's religious vaccine exemption.
The Third District held that a psychologist's petition to end her five-year probation early gets deferential substantial-evidence review, not independent judgment.
The Sixth District held that a lot line adjustment bundled with the town's acceptance of a street easement was discretionary and not exempt from CEQA.
The Second District held that an employer faces strict liability only when the harasser supervises the plaintiff, not when the harasser supervises other employees.
A divided Second District panel reversed trial court orders that had invalidated an arbitration agreement, holding that strategic delay in asserting a sexual harassment claim forfeited the federal statute's protections.