The Court of Appeals said the trial court never explained why it rejected a West Virginia firm's jurisdiction challenge and a bid to send the dispute to FINRA arbitration.
Massachusetts' top court held that trade secret plaintiffs must prove irreparable harm and upheld a refusal to bar ex-Daikin workers from soliciting 75 customers.
The court held that Pioneer's post-priority experiments showing only 2 of 8 tested enzymes worked properly supported a finding of non-enablement.
The appeals court held that Truinject failed to preserve its damages arguments below, ending an eight-year trade-secret and contract dispute.
The appeals court reversed an indefiniteness ruling, clarifying that scientific impossibility goes to enablement, not claim scope.
The court held that republishing an entire viral clip and using recognizable screenshots can defeat fair-use and de minimis defenses at the pleading stage, though it affirmed dismissal of claims tied to a YouTube-embedded interview.
A published Fourth Circuit panel said Abitron changed the Lanham Act analysis but did not spare a Dutch software company from a preliminary injunction in a cross-border trademark and trade secrets fight.
A Fourth Circuit panel said the Supreme Court's Abitron trademark ruling did not undo an injunction against Dutch company DMARC Advisor because the record showed conduct directed at U.S. customers, not just overseas activity with domestic effects.
A D.C. federal magistrate judge said the adult-film copyright plaintiff may seek identifying information for a John Doe internet subscriber tied to alleged BitTorrent infringement.
The Fifth Circuit said a Louisiana LLC that dissolved before suing Vendera and BOKF lacked capacity to bring its trade secrets and contract claims, but sent a sealing order back for a public-access analysis.
Deputy Assistant Attorney General Dina Kallay said patents, including standard-essential patents, should not be treated as automatic market-power proof and defended injunction access for patent owners.
A D.C. Circuit panel refused to pause an order requiring President Donald Trump's name to be removed from Kennedy Center signage, website references and related trademark applications, finding no showing of irreparable harm.
The justices said an internet provider is not contributorily liable for users' infringement merely because it kept providing service after receiving infringement notices.
The justices unanimously held that Amarin did not plausibly allege Hikma actively encouraged infringement of Vascepa cardiovascular-use patents.